If you think Anonthony's the only person who makes decision and decides of site policy, you're dead wrong, never would he dare say anything that goes against all of our opinions.
We are very much aware of what /anon/ is for, and I myself personally make sure that anonymous culture is preserved as much as possible on that board - I always have and still believe that anonymous users are the soul of any imageboard, and you can search /site/ for me saying that way
before /mlp/ ever moved to this site.
However you must understand you're an extreme of the debate here, and catering to extreme is never a good idea. You are solely
responsible for a large majority of complaining and reporting against tripfags and namefags, not you and a few others, not a small minority, you, one user
As it stands, most anons who are bothered by namefags are bothered by them shitposting or getting stuck in endless internet dick-size contests, and I can assure you that annoys everyone.
Just because we don't say 'Don't post with a name without creating content or we'll ban you' doesn't mean we don't care about anon culture, it simply means such a policy would be overly strict, and when you start setting harsh policies one way, people are going to start asking for other extreme measures in the long run. To take a very
extreme examples, tripfags could argue names should be obligatory on /oat/, of course that won't happen, but I hope you see what I'm getting at here. To be more realistic, it could be used in an argument for a filter that'd filter out all anon posts, with the arguments you're using. Which I disagree with equally.
I have the utmost respect for anonymous culture, I believe it is what drives imageboards to be so unique and creative in their own way, but I also don't think bringing the banhammer on any person who posts with a name is a good option here.
Macil's idea of allowing the OP to choose if names can be in a thread or not, kind of like the #Mature tag, is I believe a good lead, and we'd like further community input on that, but if what you want is tyrannical moderation, even on namefags, you won't get it here. As much respect as I have for Anonymous, it's only half of my userbase and I respect the other half equally.
I hope that answers your concern